Hot 100
Music/News

Bad Bunny Wins Reversal in the Reggaeton Lawsuit That Put Nearly 2,000 Songs at Risk

A federal judge threw out the central claim over the dembow rhythm, ruling that copyright cannot be built from pieces of three different recordings.

September 2, 2026 · 2 min read · No. 0207
Bad Bunny Wins Reversal in the Reggaeton Lawsuit That Put Nearly 2,000 Songs at Risk
Bad Bunny at the Grammys in Los Angeles on Feb. 1, 2026. Getty Images · Photo: Getty Images via PitchforkNo. 0207
Bad BunnyLatin · Vega Baja, Puerto RicoArtist profile →

Reggaeton’s most threatening lawsuit just lost its engine. On Tuesday (Sept. 1), U.S. District Judge André Birotte Jr. reversed his own July ruling and tossed the central copyright theory in the case against Bad Bunny, Drake and more than 150 other artists, according to Rolling Stone, which obtained the order.

The suit, filed in 2021 by Cleveland “Clevie” Browne and the heirs of Wycliffe “Steely” Johnson, argued that their 1989 song “Fish Market” is the source of the dembow rhythm, the percussion pattern that runs through the genre. Their claims eventually reached nearly 2,000 songs, among them “Despacito,” “Tití Me Preguntó” and “Dame Tu Cosita,” per Music Business Worldwide.

Read moreDrake’s HABIBTI (FOMO) Is Tracking for No. 2 as Coachella 2027 Talk Builds

Birotte had ruled in July that the dispute belonged in front of a jury. Bad Bunny’s lawyers asked him to think again, calling the claim a “Frankenstein” copyright because the arrangement the plaintiffs describe does not appear in any single song they own. After an Aug. 14 hearing, he agreed.

Because plaintiffs have not identified a single copyrighted work containing the alleged protectable selection and arrangement, plaintiffs cannot, as a matter of law, proceed on the theory presently pleaded.

Judge André Birotte Jr., in his order, Rolling Stone

What it means for reggaeton

Kenneth Freundlich, Bad Bunny’s lead lawyer, had warned that the discovery and trial preparation for the original case could run “into 2035.” After the ruling, he called it a win for the whole genre:

The court has now confirmed what the defendants have maintained from the outset: that copyright protects an original, single work, not a combination of elements assembled from several different songs for the purpose of a lawsuit.

Kenneth Freundlich, Bad Bunny’s lawyer, Rolling Stone

Other defendants who backed the motion include Karol G, Daddy Yankee, J Balvin, Pitbull and Justin Bieber, as well as Drake’s OVO Sound, UMG Recordings and Empire. Complex notes the ruling shields more than 150 artists.

What’s still in play

This isn’t the end of the case. Birotte did not rule on whether the rhythm itself is original, and claims that individual artists directly sampled Steely & Clevie’s sound recordings are still alive, though Remezcla describes them as much narrower. The judge told the parties to propose a schedule for those remaining claims.

The win lands in a big year for Bad Bunny, who headlined the Super Bowl LX halftime show in February and took the Grammy for Album of the Year with Debí Tirar Más Fotos.

Fast facts
Ruling
Sept. 1, 2026, Judge André Birotte Jr.
Case
Steely & Clevie v. Bad Bunny and more than 150 other artists
Claimed work
“Fish Market” (1989)
Still alive
Narrower direct-sampling claims

Added to the High Grailed archive on October 12, 2026.

More from Music

Up next